Executive Orders
Presidential executive orders, including their legal significance and specific orders affecting financial regulation, rulemaking, and agency independence.
Pages on this topic
Analysis
Beyond Slaughter: OMB and Independent Federal Agencies
Aug. 12, 2026
In Trump v. Slaughter, the U.S. Supreme Court made a profound change to the administrative state. The Court ruled that "for cause" removal protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are an unconstitutional infringement on the President's executive powers. Gone is Humphrey's Executor v. United States, the seminal case that upheld limits on the President's authority to remove FTC Commissioners, and nine decades of independent agency leadership with a degree of insulation from Presidential control. The implication of Slaughter for other independent agencies, including the...
Analysis
Recent Executive Orders Regarding Financial Services
May 20, 2026
On Tuesday, May 19th, President Trump issued two Executive Orders regarding financial services. The first, Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks, addresses the role of fintechs in the financial system, including supporting bank-fintech partnerships, charters, and access to Federal Reserve payment systems. The second, Restoring Integrity to America’s Financial System, covers banking products and services provided to immigrants and related BSA/AML and ability-to-repay requirements. Neither will result in immediate changes. Rather, the EOs direct the federal...
Analysis
Presidential Memorandum Directing the Repeal of Unlawful Regulations
April 23, 2025
On April 9, 2025, President Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum “Directing the Repeal of Unlawful Regulations” and an accompanying “Fact Sheet” (the Presidential Memorandum and the Fact Sheet shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Memorandum”) directing the heads of federal agencies to expeditiously repeal “facially unlawful regulations.” The Memorandum requires the agencies to prioritize the repeal of regulations that conflict with ten Supreme Court decisions listed in the Memorandum, and requires the agencies to act without following the Administrative Procedure Act’s (APA) notice and...
Insight
EO floats bypass of notice-and-comment for deregulatory actions
April 10, 2025
Major developments re the Deregulation EO 14219, including a plan to bypass notice-and-comment on some regs. A new EO signed yesterday orders agency heads to bypass notice-and-comment if a rule they want to repeal is "in conflict with" one of 10 listed Supreme Court decisions (including Loper Bright and Jarkesy). Agency heads are to prioritize this immediately after the scheduled end of the regulatory review on April 20, invoking the "good cause" exception under the APA. The original EO 14219 ordered a comprehensive review of regulation and guidance under seven factors, four of which...
Insight
EO 14219 and MRAs, MRIAs & MRBAs
March 11, 2025
EO 14219 and MRAs, MRIAs & MRBAs -- an example from the FDIC Crypto Documents: EO 14219 orders agencies to de-prioritize (and terminate) enforcement inconsistent with Administration policy and legal views. The banking world saw a wave of terminations last week. But there will be others we can't see. That's because the EO's broad definition of "enforcement action" seems to encompass certain confidential supervisory processes that bank regulators do not typically deem "enforcement" -- including Matters Requiring Attention (MRAs), Matters Requiring Immediate Attention (MRIAs), and Matters...
Insight
EO 14219 and the Prudential Regulators
March 6, 2025
It seems like the broad regulatory review ordered by EO 14219 was drowned out by last month’s other noise. And, at most agencies, staffing upheaval will make it hard to take rapid deregulatory action. But for the prudential banking regulators, the situation might be different. ➡️ Broad Regulatory Review The EO calls for a government-wide review of regulations AND guidance for modification or rescission under seven legal or policy grounds. Four of the seven implicate conservative legal theories on federalism, delegation, and statutory interpretation. The other three implicate the...
Analysis
The "Ensuring Lawful Governance" Order Seeks Broad Regulatory Pull-Back
Feb. 27, 2025
On February 19, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing a broad-based effort to scale back administrative regulations and enforcement across the Federal Government (the “Deregulation Order”). The Deregulation Order calls for a government-wide review of regulations for modification or rescission under seven enumerated legal or policy grounds. It also orders agencies to de-prioritize enforcement inconsistent with Administration policy and legal views, including termination of ongoing proceedings. While the Deregulation Order applies to almost all domestic non-security...
Analysis
Independent Agencies and the Executive Order on "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies"
Feb. 20, 2025
On February 18, 2025, President Trump issued a new Executive Order entitled “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies” (the “Agency Accountability E.O.”). The Agency Accountability E.O. amends E.O. 12866 issued by President Clinton in 1993 (“E.O. 12866”) and adds requirements for independent regulatory agencies that go well beyond the scope of E.O. 12866. As described below, the Agency Accountability E.O. provides for an unprecedented degree of executive control over independent agencies, not only in connection with rulemaking, but also in connection with policy and budgetary matters. As a...
Analysis
Application of the 10-for-1 Directive to Independent Federal Agencies
Feb. 7, 2025
This past week, President Trump issued an executive order aimed at reducing Federal regulations (“Executive Order”). The Executive Order directs Federal agencies to identify at least 10 existing regulations to be repealed for every new regulation that is proposed by the agency (the “10-for-1 Directive”). This 10-for-1 Directive is similar to an executive order issued in the first Trump administration that required the repeal of 2 existing regulations for each newly issued regulation (the “2-for-1 Directive”). In the first Trump administration, OMB determined that the 2-for-1 Directive did not...
Analysis
The Unintended Consequences of Defunding the CFPB
Feb. 4, 2025
Under current law, the operations of the CFPB are funded by a transfer of “earnings” from the Federal Reserve System to the CFPB. Since the Federal Reserve System is operating at a loss due to rising interest rates and arguably has no earnings, the Administration has been urged to shut down the agency by executive order. (See Chopra is Out. Now Shutter the CFPB, by Hal Scott in the Wall Street Journal, February 3, 2025.) As discussed below, such an order would have some unintended effects on the application of federal consumer financial laws to banks and certain nonbanks. Executive orders...
Analysis
Background on Executive Orders
Jan. 20, 2025
In anticipation of a series of executive orders by President Trump, this memorandum summarizes the legal basis for, and limitations upon, executive orders. Neither the Constitution nor any federal statute defines an “Executive Order.” Federal law merely requires that executive orders be published in the Federal Register (44 U.S.C. §1505). In 1962, President Kennedy established, by Executive Order 11030, procedural requirements for the issuance of executive orders. Those requirements call for a draft order to be reviewed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the...